A voluntary new universal food labelling system aimed at making it
easier and quicker for consumers to make healthier food choices was
announced yesterday by the government.
It is one of many initiatives that health ministers are hoping will
be affective at reducing the billions of pounds the NHS lose annually
due to the nation’s poor diet, leading to an ever-increasing number of
obesity-related health conditions such as cancer, diabetes and heart
disease.
The overhaul on how a product’s
nutritional information is displayed was agreed upon by the government,
food manufacturers and food retailers. The standardised front-of-label
packaging will be introduced by December 2014 by those parties who have
agreed to sign up to the changes.
Currently, food and drink manufacturers are not forced into stating
nutritional information, and as such, those that do decide to state it
can vary in what information they give. One of the biggest complaints
consumers have about so many differing food labels is that they are
simply confusing.
The vast variety of labels has been attributed to growing customer
demand for more nutritional information; however there has never been an
agreement on a consistent system for displaying this information –
until now. The new labelling system will therefore enable people to
compare similar foods to easier select the healthier option.
Presently, nutritional information can be stated either on the back,
side or on the front of packaging. However, the new standardised labels
for food and drink and drink products will be clearly displayed on the
front of the product and consumers will be quickly able to see the
amount of energy in kilojoules (kJ) contained, in addition to
kilocalories (kcal) – known as calories, fat and saturated fat content,
the amount of sugar and the amount of salt. ‘Guideline Daily Amounts’
will disappear and the amounts of each will now be explained as
‘Reference Intakes’.
Those amounts will be accompanied with how much of the maximum daily
intake a portion of food accounts for. The already commonly used traffic
light system for food labelling will be deemed the standard display for
a quick glance at a product’s nutritional value in regards to fat,
saturated fat, sugar and salt – Red means high, amber means medium and
green means low.
The voluntary new scheme, part of the government’s ‘Responsibility
Deal’, has received positive feedback from supermarkets and
manufacturers that had showed disdain for changes in the past.
Nestle, Mars, PepsiCo, Premier Foods and McCain have all signed up,
together with major supermarkets accounting for 60% of food sales in the
UK; Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Asda, Morrisons, Marks & Spencer, the
Co-operative and Waitrose.
Speaking about the new food labelling, Public Health Minister Anna
Soubry said: “The UK already has the largest number of products using a
front of pack label in Europe but we know that people get confused by
the variety of labels that are used. Research shows that, of all the
current schemes, people like this label the most and they can use the
information to make healthier choices. We all have a responsibility to
tackle the challenge of obesity,
including the food industry. By having all major retailers and
manufacturers signed up to the consistent label, we will all be able to
see at a glance what is in our food – this is why I want to see more
manufacturers signing up and using the label.”
Which? Executive Director, Richard Lloyd, also commented about the
issue, saying: “For years Which? has been calling for food companies to
use traffic light labels so we welcome this big step forward towards
making it easier for consumers to make healthy choices. With levels of
obesity and diet-related disease on the increase, it’s vitally important
that people know what is in their food, and this labelling scheme will
encourage food companies to do more to reduce the amount of sugar, salt
and fat in popular products. We hope that more food manufacturers will
join the scheme so that their labels will be consistent and comparable
to those on the front of the retailers’ own packs.”
No comments:
Post a Comment