Almost from the moment they have given birth it seems new mothers are
under heavy pressure to breastfeed their baby, with health experts long
championing the health benefits of breastfeeding.
In fact, breast-fed babies have been said to be at a lower risk of
suffering with sudden infant death syndrome, have less infections in
their early years. Moreover, there are said to be health benefits in the
long-term, with breast-fed babies growing up to be less likely to
develop asthma, be obese, have high blood pressure or high cholesterol and type 2 diabetes.
However, all this could be thrown onto its head with the findings of a new study published in the Social Science & Medicine,
which may finally help to shed the stigma of bottle-feeding a new-born
baby and raises questions about previous studies that have supported and
pushed for mother mothers to breastfeed, sometimes putting unfair
pressure on mums to do this.
Lead author of the study Dr Cynthia Colen, from Ohio State
University, and fellow researchers analysed 665 families in which there
were siblings fed differently during their early years. In total, there
was 8,237 children made up of 7,319 siblings and 1,773 ‘discordant’
sibling pairs; one was breastfed with the other was fed with bottled
milk.
In all of the families looked at, breastfeeding showed better
outcomes for BMI, hyperactivity, maths, reading recognition, vocabulary
word identification, digit recollection, scholastic competence and
obesity.
However, when the analysis was focused purely on siblings fed
differently within the same families, researchers discovered that the
scores demonstrating breast-feeding’s positive benefits on 10 of the
indicators were close to zero and therefore not deemed statistically
significant. This means any health variances in those families may have
happened by chance.
The only health condition that was found to have a significant
difference in regards to breast-fed and bottle-fed siblings was asthma.
Dr Colen actually claims that breast-fed babies were actually at a
higher risk for developing asthma later in their life.
She said: “Many previous studies suffer from selection bias. They
either do not or cannot statistically control for factors such as race,
age, family income, mother’s employment – things we know that can affect
both breast-feeding and health outcomes. Mums with more resources –
with higher levels of education and higher levels of income – and more
flexibility in their daily schedules are more likely to breastfeed their
children and do so for longer periods of time.”
NHS guidance recommends new mothers to breastfeed for the initial six
months (26 weeks) of a new-born’s life. Following this, breast milk
alongside other food will “help them continue to grow and develop”,
according to the NHS.
Dr Colen added: “I’m not saying breastfeeding is not beneficial,
especially for boosting nutrition and immunity in new-borns. But if we
really want to improve maternal and child health, let’s also focus on
things that can really do that in the long term – like subsidised day
care, better maternity leave policies and more employment opportunities
for low-income mothers that pay a living wage, for example.”
No comments:
Post a Comment